From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCEF7A2760
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:08:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A788B27CA7
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:07:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:07:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EE31640D34;
 Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:07:47 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <2f5a0e57-b478-508e-c9e2-d03cf4d3c82e@proxmox.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:07:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>,
 "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 "aderumier@odiso.com" <aderumier@odiso.com>
References: <20230609102701.783833-1-aderumier@odiso.com>
 <9132e8ee-5c12-2966-8c5c-8d9bad4d64f2@proxmox.com>
 <1d140b10724747b8d33f8e48c2a564e4aa9df65b.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <1d140b10724747b8d33f8e48c2a564e4aa9df65b.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.002 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A            -0.09 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] cpuconfig: add missing qemu 8.0
 cpu models
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 10:08:18 -0000


Am 19.06.23 um 11:19 schrieb DERUMIER, Alexandre:
> Le lundi 19 juin 2023 à 10:46 +0200, Fiona Ebner a écrit :
> 
>> I also noticed that
>> Denverton{-v2,-v3}
>> Snowridge{-v2,-v3,-v4}
> 
> Both are atom cpu. I don't known if we want to support them ? (they
> seem to support vtx, so it should work with kvm)
> 
>> Dhyana{-v2}
> This is a chinese fork of epyc (without aes), I don't known if we need
> to support it ?
>>
> 

I'm also not sure, that's why I asked. Maybe better to hold off for now
and wait until somebody asks for them :)