From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6525E7216C for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:27:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 55F4BAF17 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:27:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.xpecto.de (mx1.xpecto.de [212.102.161.249]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A0784AF0E for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:27:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (mx1.xpecto.de [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.xpecto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405C5320030 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:26:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xpecto.com; s=20170902; t=1633516014; bh=n07GptoE2Omia27fg3oS8pwLg4oDYZ+9FZLuN7N78/k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=jeNwO+OIIhhYKHS0N3sVOwv8M6WKNJVm36zTb2C3o+0und/2kjCt7z6nCBu/76Sok PsXSpe0tNfPPzFsBJ2SRY/IeSW4wZ9wjMSMfrKhS4By+mf5Z7w30qR8JQiTyGylHyV 9hvjZjIDZkoIhdcy0PSL8ej/FbUCJzb+em3brIPpZKNYdxeQHQPnCWz+TOUIKYqg+r fGOmZJQSQcOi14BiFEYnqiU9APA+UczMV9fqvyzL0xyTcX6Oe+JfJ3VM4RAQthqouC qdqpS/i5fklAVHU6oY1Poay5o3QxuKsN8kg5ha3hly1IOEBAkgyHFkHeozMLaw8ir+ OP8t0iOZAaAKg== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mx1.xpecto.de X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -50.59 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-50.59 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, LOCAL_RCVD=-50, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx1.xpecto.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.xpecto.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8EV5EFPCTyg for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:26:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postman.xpecto.de (postman.xpecto.local [10.208.30.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.xpecto.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:26:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from postman.xpecto.local (10.208.30.11) by postman.xpecto.local (10.208.30.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.7; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:26:52 +0200 Received: from postman.xpecto.local ([fe80::f965:5e8e:bcd:74f3]) by postman.xpecto.local ([fe80::f965:5e8e:bcd:74f3%4]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.007; Wed, 6 Oct 2021 12:26:52 +0200 From: Christoph Weber To: "'pve-user@lists.proxmox.com'" Thread-Topic: pve-user Digest, Vol 163, Issue 5 Thread-Index: AQHXupjyAX7P3AuK5EWmtN2p9AjoqqvFvVkg Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:26:52 +0000 Message-ID: <2c5240b5251d414992adca0f48a66385@xpecto.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.2.17] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.043 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain KAM_NUMSUBJECT 0.5 Subject ends in numbers excluding current years SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record T_SPF_PERMERROR 0.01 SPF: test of record failed (permerror) URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [xpecto.com] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] pve-user Digest, Vol 163, Issue 5 X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:27:01 -0000 Hi Sonam, > Does anyone have guides to configure NFS Ganesha on guest LXC to share > host CephFS ? I tried but couldn't get it working. I have not tried a LXC container, but a few weeks ago with a QEMU VM runnin= g Ubuntu 20.10.=20 This did work pretty nicely. I only had problems making the RecoveryBackend= work with rados_cluster without time to look more into it, because it need= s to be a high-availability-configuration. Maybe the lxc container needs additional privileges like discussed here? https://gist.github.com/rwenz3l/0907385f6a6690c34eb8e36fa73d8405 > For Proxmox 5.3, there is a Options -> Features where you have to sele= ct "Nesting" and "NFS". Will still need to check what of the above is neede= d as I used a big hammer "turn off apparmor" approach, but still had to do = the Nesting 7 NFS selections