From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5DD371713
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D832A196CC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 71AE8196C0
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 485E8465F9
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <2ad49ad8-2a99-5748-c12f-60fffd0c8719@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 12:30:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/89.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Dominic_J=c3=a4ger?= <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
References: <20210519091419.18921-1-d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210519091419.18921-1-d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied:  [PATCH manager 1/2] ui: qemu: eslint fixes
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 10:30:56 -0000

On 19.05.21 11:14, Dominic J=C3=A4ger wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dominic J=C3=A4ger <d.jaeger@proxmox.com>
> ---
> These 2 patches fix the remaining errors for manager6/qemu and manager6=
/storage
> (manager6/lxc is already OK)
>=20
>  www/manager6/qemu/CmdMenu.js | 2 +-
>  www/manager6/qemu/PCIEdit.js | 7 +++++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>=20
>

applied both, thanks!

FYI; Threw in some more (general) code cleanup/refactoring for the PCI ed=
it one.