From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C1A1FF139
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:09:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 711E8597D;
	Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:10:09 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <24e25cb9-1509-488c-bab3-878815319d6d@proxmox.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:09:34 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH docs/manager/network/proxmox{-ve-rs,-perl-rs} 00/23]
 Generate frr config using jinja templates and rust types
To: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>,
 Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
References: <20260203160246.353351-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>
 <390832c4-884b-4197-becf-49cd484c1043@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <390832c4-884b-4197-becf-49cd484c1043@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
	AWL                     0.723 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From:
 address
	BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
	DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
	KAM_DMARC_STATUS         0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
 Alignment
	SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
	SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Message-ID-Hash: R5NTJOMDVX246T2TTFJI445LS6SMFOOR
X-Message-ID-Hash: R5NTJOMDVX246T2TTFJI445LS6SMFOOR
X-MailFrom: s.hanreich@proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop;
 banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation;
 administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation;
 no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:pve-devel-owner@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-join@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pve-devel-leave@lists.proxmox.com>

On 2/23/26 5:10 PM, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> Aside from the few things I have mentioned on the oatches directly, I
> did also give this spin. Setup EVPN on different fabrics and tried quite
> option combinations. Did not notice anything where behaviour was
> unexpected or diverge from the behavior of the current master.
> 
> in the process I did write some tests for our new proxmox-test-tools, I
> was wondering if anyone else (@Gabriel, @Stefan maybe?) did the same
> already, and if it would make sense putting these is a single repo for
> now?

I have some as well in my private repository - I'll send you the info!