From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE39622A6
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:14:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 822212E234
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:14:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 15FDA2E226
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:14:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DBECC45F04
 for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:14:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Reply-To: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
References: <20201005145703.26529-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <247ceac4-6d4e-e57f-8ccf-6bb45d059a37@proxmox.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:14:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201005145703.26529-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.121 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [api2.rs, ping.rs]
Subject: [pbs-devel] applied: [PATCH backup] api: add world accessible ping
 dummy endpoint
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
 <pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>, 
 <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:14:59 -0000

On 05.10.20 16:57, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> This is indented to be used for the PVE storage library, replacing
> the missuse of the much more expensive status API call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> I initially thought about adding this to the proxmox-backup-client as command,
> but it's not much of use there (user can just use the version command) and for
> the PVE integration we can do a simple http request with LWP, which is much
> cheaper than fork+exec the client there.
> 
>  src/api2.rs      |  2 ++
>  src/api2/ping.rs | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 src/api2/ping.rs
> 
>

applied