From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <aderumier@odiso.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FAF76B6F8 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:18:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 905FC2242A for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:17:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0A4A82241D for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:17:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id y17so9376677wrr.10 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:17:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=vCfxe9aZGmNBVan/oiV+BocyCSpoanRHXdJ+qEAtFng=; b=J8yNP4wLI+chlaMKIW+H6ZX4zMreLMCA3a2SwdHOlzlHgHe8xclrGKlW7Sy320xrGq q31TsFBGgYOIAVNFQlJQHt9h72YopjXpz1IQOWDDz350WTbulVRkufDgnPTBKYrZoKy9 azR6ryKkynWG/gZpK8CWCA7sJUxLNT6ikjDc9CJknuK4L2oqBuJeN0fmaKOAxQ9jX+88 Js9C+KrkV6JI96RLqEUfaur4udnTJgTaMcYdce0+X2KBj50/wi6W/hEvcZGy2ufn4yUp 6ArRsy+nIQthfPIy9y3Ka6RMm4Qd4EcsF8RTCvuyhX6wfhpfPeER6VkfpwYIAHTL4nqx +g5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=vCfxe9aZGmNBVan/oiV+BocyCSpoanRHXdJ+qEAtFng=; b=eDQXj6BycUjm9oTW1kS1Bd34V8ATFCTkh7yRA7sIiMXvO4TCOS69mlcG8QAUTZA30t OdcCYLopOmyD2K0+S33nTJAqd8bl6O742n5sJoorEguVdSv4jQ/i/6Vc5s77YMAX3qLK FwhjVale1spEYEap1mrt8KWzal6i+0T/rMSnvBNLyyZaWTZ+pFEMqu7ULjf8zbxE5fSz 90EggZgzXywGJzEDR1HnBs68iIhjYHjkzUfOfo4vf2ObYDefzeyEWeVVpOTZrO1OFznx AfU284xUT1bShw1A3l0irO542QYWQn4B+A3picHL0o6ywg7Xy3cWWn4Sk9towwLuELkp knxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pV+OothZlQmmFOzqlCQTM65LlaJWEELDLIZbUNga0gd2Zz0Eq IhINTnEEg7vA4sg2tnc20Fstzm50+OO24+FX X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJylIJwkGc9vO6k4YQjndGNaFxcS0JM92Enav3LDbB3oGmeJvkG9Ilx7Dfqb7QZ9WjDpkYdd0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4a10:: with SMTP id m16mr14779755wrq.18.1607699862439; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:17:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.59.100.98] (globalOdiso.M6Lille.odiso.net. [89.248.211.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm16601324wrc.87.2020.12.11.07.17.41 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 07:17:41 -0800 (PST) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <CAPEXuiwNr3OjBh9ArMiBToVAD6EXf5Rp+Ph7OswvAkmFWPmUwg@mail.gmail.com> <dba3eab5-6b50-a235-8f62-c07c0827f45c@odiso.com> <CAPEXuizOTE-D20ijT_shrxZkiYt89UF-+OFK-RzWvefhb_J0Gw@mail.gmail.com> From: alexandre derumier <aderumier@odiso.com> Message-ID: <21a61f20-2889-189c-084e-221fbb93d720@odiso.com> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:17:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <CAPEXuizOTE-D20ijT_shrxZkiYt89UF-+OFK-RzWvefhb_J0Gw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 AWL 0.420 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS 0.8 Spam that uses ascii formatting tricks NICE_REPLY_A -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [pve-manager] sdn: Adding phpIPAM as IPAM provider X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:18:20 -0000 The code is already commited :) https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-network.git;a=blob;f=PVE/Network/SDN/Ipams/PhpIpamPlugin.pm;h=6261764ffb5cb9d7b2bc865704ac74663790d860;hb=HEAD It's not yet released, but I'll keep you in touch for testing if you want. (I have implement basic things (add/del subnet, add/del ip, find next free ip), but if you need more options, I could implement them too) On 10/12/2020 22:41, Bruce Wainer wrote: > Great thanks, I thought I had seen it in one of the patches but when I > looked back at some of the more recent submissions it looked like only the > internal IPAM was being implemented at first. > Bruce > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:33 AM alexandre derumier <aderumier@odiso.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> phpIPAM is already implemented :) >> >> (currently phpIPAM && netbox) >> >> On 09/12/2020 20:01, Bruce Wainer wrote: >>> Hello, >>> In your new SDN environment, are there plans for a plugin for phpIPAM? If >>> not, can you provide any starting points for developing one? >>> Thank you, >>> Bruce Wainer >>> _______________________________________________ >>> pve-devel mailing list >>> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com >>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-devel mailing list >> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >> >> > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel >