From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E727F1FF09D for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2026 00:00:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C0136217BA; Sun, 01 Nov 2026 23:59:16 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Lamprecht To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH manager 14/19] ui: backup job: add concurrency and overlap options Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 23:58:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20261101225849.884587-15-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20261101225849.884587-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> References: <20261101225849.884587-1-t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1793573948669 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.392 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: JJS3S4ARDIVCRMVGBSJBQJIV5O7DVYAE X-Message-ID-Hash: JJS3S4ARDIVCRMVGBSJBQJIV5O7DVYAE X-MailFrom: t.lamprecht@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Add the new job options to the advanced tab. An empty concurrency field uses the fallback from the node's vzdump.conf like the other options there. An unchecked overlap box is stored as off, like the fleecing one, as deleting it would let an overlap setting in vzdump.conf apply while the box shows otherwise. The bandwidth limit applies to each guest backup on its own, so with several guests backed up at the same time their total can be higher. Say so in its description. Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht --- www/manager6/panel/BackupAdvancedOptions.js | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/www/manager6/panel/BackupAdvancedOptions.js b/www/manager6/panel/BackupAdvancedOptions.js index fe8cc3bf7..8af0fa77e 100644 --- a/www/manager6/panel/BackupAdvancedOptions.js +++ b/www/manager6/panel/BackupAdvancedOptions.js @@ -154,7 +154,45 @@ Ext.define('PVE.panel.BackupAdvancedOptions', { endFlex: 2, endColumn: { xtype: 'displayfield', - value: `${gettext('Limit I/O bandwidth.')} ${Ext.String.format(gettext('Schema default: {0}'), 0)}`, + value: `${gettext('Limit I/O bandwidth of each guest backup.')} ${Ext.String.format(gettext('Schema default: {0}'), 0)}`, + }, + }, + { + xtype: 'pveTwoColumnContainer', + startColumn: { + xtype: 'proxmoxintegerfield', + name: 'concurrency', + minValue: 1, + fieldLabel: gettext('Concurrency'), + fieldStyle: 'text-align: right', + emptyText: gettext('Fallback'), + cbind: { + deleteEmpty: '{!isCreate}', + }, + }, + endFlex: 2, + endColumn: { + xtype: 'displayfield', + value: gettext( + 'Guests backed up at the same time on each node, at most the backup concurrency of the node.', + ), + }, + }, + { + xtype: 'pveTwoColumnContainer', + startColumn: { + xtype: 'proxmoxcheckbox', + fieldLabel: gettext('Overlap'), + name: 'overlap', + uncheckedValue: 0, + value: 0, + }, + endFlex: 2, + endColumn: { + xtype: 'displayfield', + value: gettext( + 'Run at the same time as other jobs that allow it. Job phases of hook scripts can then overlap.', + ), }, }, { -- 2.47.3