From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6821FF09C for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:54:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 501F4215F2; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:54:26 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Michael=20K=C3=B6ppl?= To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH pve-manager v5 7/7] close #4369: ui: add datacenter option for unique VM/CT IDs Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:54:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20260921155410.938337-8-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260921155410.938337-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> References: <20260921155410.938337-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1790006059731 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.535 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: JCZZEVSNGDP6ZULOK2QKRMOUIMUPRHUV X-Message-ID-Hash: JCZZEVSNGDP6ZULOK2QKRMOUIMUPRHUV X-MailFrom: m.koeppl@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Severen Redwood Add a 'suggest unique VMIDs' row to the datacenter options page that allows choosing whether the `/cluster/nextid` API endpoint (and thereby any UI elements that suggest IDs) should avoid suggesting previously used IDs. This option defaults to off to ensure that this change in behaviour is opt in. Co-authored-by: Daniel Krambrock Signed-off-by: Severen Redwood [MK: rebase on latest master] Signed-off-by: Michael Köppl --- www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js b/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js index dc12aa7e1..490df0028 100644 --- a/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js +++ b/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js @@ -384,6 +384,10 @@ Ext.define('PVE.dc.OptionView', { }, ], }); + me.add_boolean_row('unique-next-id', gettext('Suggest unique VMIDs'), { + defaultValue: 0, + deleteDefaultValue: true, + }); me.rows['tag-style'] = { required: true, renderer: (value) => { -- 2.47.3