From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [45.144.208.40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5001FF0E1 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:28:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9F1A7214B6; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:28:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH manager v2 4/4] ui: qemu: hardware edit: create EFI disk via asynchronous API Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 17:27:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20260727152730.947259-5-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260727152730.947259-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20260727152730.947259-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1785166019405 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.196 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.7 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: UKSCP5S5PNZLZOCL2G4OJ5HC6N52HUHW X-Message-ID-Hash: UKSCP5S5PNZLZOCL2G4OJ5HC6N52HUHW X-MailFrom: f.ebner@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Specifying a backgroundDelay aligns the EFI edit panel with the panel for regular drives and makes the input panel use a POST method for the API request. Otherwise, task warnings from the operation are not visible and since the EFI disk needs to be copied to the target storage, IO is involved, so in principle, the operation might take a while in certain situations. Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner Tested-by: Lukas Sichert --- No changes in v2. www/manager6/qemu/HDEfi.js | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/HDEfi.js b/www/manager6/qemu/HDEfi.js index 1ae63add..14a64fc0 100644 --- a/www/manager6/qemu/HDEfi.js +++ b/www/manager6/qemu/HDEfi.js @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.qemu.EFIDiskEdit', { extend: 'Proxmox.window.Edit', isAdd: true, + backgroundDelay: 5, subject: gettext('EFI Disk'), width: 450, -- 2.47.3