From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC631FF14C for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5F4371344D; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:34:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Hanreich To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH docs/manager/network/proxmox{-ve-rs,-perl-rs} 0/5] Add MTU setting to WireGuard interfaces Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:33:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20260626133357.274255-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1782480836843 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.593 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [wireguard.rs,fabrics.pm,fabrics.rs] Message-ID-Hash: 5QXMZ3L25LEM5JUX2TKIZHAN54RKKSAZ X-Message-ID-Hash: 5QXMZ3L25LEM5JUX2TKIZHAN54RKKSAZ X-MailFrom: s.hanreich@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: This patch series adds support for configuring the MTU for WireGuard interfaces. Since changing the default value in the API would be breaking, make it a soft default by pre-filling the MTU value in the UI with 1420, which should work for most use-cases, as it is the maximum MTU possible if using Ethernet with IPv6. proxmox-ve-rs: Stefan Hanreich (1): wireguard: add mtu option to wireguard interface properties .../sdn/fabric/section_config/protocol/wireguard.rs | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) proxmox-perl-rs: Stefan Hanreich (1): fabrics: wireguard: render mtu to interface config pve-rs/src/bindings/sdn/fabrics.rs | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) pve-network: Stefan Hanreich (1): fabrics: wireguard: add mtu to interface properties src/PVE/Network/SDN/Fabrics.pm | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) pve-manager: Stefan Hanreich (1): fabrics: wireguard: add mtu to interface properties www/manager6/sdn/fabrics/wireguard/InterfacePanel.js | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) pve-docs: Stefan Hanreich (1): sdn: fabrics: wireguard: document mtu option pvesdn.adoc | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Summary over all repositories: 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) -- Generated by murpp 0.12.0