From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FA7D1FF141 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:37:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC7E63F28; Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:36:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antreich.com; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:from :from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to :subject:subject:to:to; s=2025; bh=7WYtBKMr34trArLaMtrOuVBJUIP50 ZgzyUh1GMETaSc=; b=eaWT+sR1oXpj4P+z7asHJQ84SQ9vKh8YTkuWOkkS61bhZ l3jyjEQ8bHgVzLymv8YH8U18sw0wxCwdbcRwo1mm2dJzWyY1+RwwyXKpWQX3zSYA KbaP83rt6R2IYo+wWXkzxcOF2s07BZkL2UTzkLfMMBREqGsVaNDABY2EdRXCDWhu 6Srz4dIHq5VE8LnoVIaN36XLtbhioeaDEvtpAcsALxeAJNb+C9eEOT1LCQeRSdth DaJAG+x27/0H/twxB7iasCDMZm0xGtdfonwIfL252QSgzFpvHH5JnqU0hmlcbEFh rICu02cupMPV5jbly8J2dpej8iJQYNLU0Z7hDuPdQ== From: Alwin Antreich To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com, =?utf-8?b?Wm9sdMOhbg==?= Szalay Subject: Re: Subject: Inquiry regarding Failover Clustering between two virtual machines References: <75bd6c40bede4543a9ab4bca2085339f@e-track.eu> In-Reply-To: <75bd6c40bede4543a9ab4bca2085339f@e-track.eu> Message-ID: <20260616102850.Horde.CAa3WusraNBshi3f7dUIUMg@drive.antreich.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 10:28:50 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.067 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_PASS -0.1 DMARC pass policy SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: OXXLXI2ZFU3Z5XHDEVCEXO5RTJSB7EPU X-Message-ID-Hash: OXXLXI2ZFU3Z5XHDEVCEXO5RTJSB7EPU X-MailFrom: alwin@antreich.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Zoltán,   "Zoltán Szalay" zszalay@e-track.eu – 16. Juni 2026 um 12:09 > Dear Proxmox Support Team, >  > I am writing to inquire about the capabilities of Proxmox VE regarding high availability and clustering. Specifically, I would like to know if Proxmox VE supports setting up a failover cluster between two virtual machines (VMs).   Do you mean by failover cluster, the equivalent of VMware vSphere Fault Tolerance? If yes, then I have to disappoint, AFAIK this functionality is not yet mature in Qemu. Hence it doesn't exist in PVE.   Best wishes, Alwin