[PATCH datacenter-manager] api: certificates: require only AUDIT for listing certificate info

[Christoph Heiss <c.heiss@proxmox.com>]

No need to have listing endpoint require MODIFY permissions.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
---
Had a brief discussion with Shannon about this - the endpoint could
probably be even public, not requiring any particular permissions?
Since certificate information isn't private (by definition) anyway. 

Or are there plans to eventually add support for having multiple
certificates or something? In which case it *might* be useful to have
not public.

Happy to send a patch for that too, but wanted to quickly discuss it
beforehand.

 server/src/api/nodes/certificates.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/server/src/api/nodes/certificates.rs b/server/src/api/nodes/certificates.rs
index 47aef7a..fc12e47 100644
--- a/server/src/api/nodes/certificates.rs
+++ b/server/src/api/nodes/certificates.rs
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ use proxmox_acme_api::{AcmeDomain, CertificateInfo};
 use proxmox_rest_server::WorkerTask;
 use proxmox_schema::api_types::NODE_SCHEMA;
 
-use pdm_api_types::PRIV_SYS_MODIFY;
+use pdm_api_types::{PRIV_SYS_AUDIT, PRIV_SYS_MODIFY};
 
 use crate::auth::certs::{API_CERT_FN, API_KEY_FN};
 
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ fn get_certificate_info() -> Result<CertificateInfo, Error> {
         },
     },
     access: {
-        permission: &Permission::Privilege(&["system", "certificates"], PRIV_SYS_MODIFY, false),
+        permission: &Permission::Privilege(&["system", "certificates"], PRIV_SYS_AUDIT, false),
     },
     returns: {
         type: Array,
-- 
2.53.0