From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 737451FF14E for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 09:31:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7A511F976; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 09:31:03 +0100 (CET) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 09:30:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20260109083058.92951-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1767947419042 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.088 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] ui: migration: Improve grammar on error string X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval --- This was spotted while translating the UI: - Toward was selected instead of towards due to it being slithly more common in written american english, and also because the string was already too long. - This string was mentioned at https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/ha-non-strict-negative-resource-affinity.176757/#post-822473 www/manager6/window/Migrate.js | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/www/manager6/window/Migrate.js b/www/manager6/window/Migrate.js index ff80c70c..702009c3 100644 --- a/www/manager6/window/Migrate.js +++ b/www/manager6/window/Migrate.js @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.window.Migrate', { if (cause === 'resource-affinity') { reasonText = Ext.String.format( gettext( - 'HA resource {0} with negative affinity to VM on selected target node', + 'HA resource {0} has negative affinity toward a VM on the selected target node', ), sid, ); @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.window.Migrate', { if (cause === 'resource-affinity') { reasonText = Ext.String.format( gettext( - 'HA resource {0} with negative affinity to container on selected target node', + 'HA resource {0} has negative affinity toward a container on the selected target node', ), sid, ); -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel