From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7E7C1FF1A6 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:25:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF5D75291; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:26:18 +0100 (CET) From: Hannes Laimer To: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 16:25:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20251205152543.91431-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1764948297740 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.051 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pdm-devel] [RFC proxmox{, -datacenter-manager, -yew-comp} 0/8] make security groups expandable in firewall rules list X-BeenThere: pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox Datacenter Manager development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pdm-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pdm-devel" This contains some rough edges, mostly UI wise, but I'd like to get some feedback on if we like this approach. Currently we don't really know what a security group actually contains, in the list currently it's a bit of a black box what a group actually does. Finding out what rules it contains is a little cumbersome. This should make that easier. It seemed like a good place too, I considerd an extra tab maybe. But especially for read-only I think this is better. This also contains a renaming, mostly cause I had it in the same repo already. If wanted, I can split that and send it separately. The pve-api.json patch contains changes from [1]. [1] https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20251128145846.328173-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com/T/#u proxmox: Hannes Laimer (4): pve-api-types: rename ListFirewallRules to FirewallRule pve-api-types: update pve-api.json pve-api-types: add security group GET endpoints pve-api-types: regenerate pve-api-types/generate.pl | 15 +- pve-api-types/pve-api.json | 1 + pve-api-types/src/generated/code.rs | 77 ++++++- pve-api-types/src/generated/types.rs | 294 +++++++++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-) proxmox-datacenter-manager: Hannes Laimer (2): pdm: rename ListFirewallRules to FirewallRule api: firewall: add pve firewall security group GET endpoints lib/pdm-client/src/lib.rs | 8 ++-- server/src/api/pve/firewall.rs | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) proxmox-yew-comp: Hannes Laimer (2): firewall: rules: rename ListFirewallRules to FirewallRule firewall: rules: make security group entries expandable src/firewall/context.rs | 12 +++ src/firewall/rules.rs | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) Summary over all repositories: 8 files changed, 514 insertions(+), 182 deletions(-) -- Generated by git-murpp 0.8.1 _______________________________________________ pdm-devel mailing list pdm-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdm-devel