From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73E01FF185 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:22:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6833EF8A; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:22:24 +0100 (CET) From: Daniel Kral To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:21:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20251117172147.533969-4-d.kral@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20251117172147.533969-1-d.kral@proxmox.com> References: <20251117172147.533969-1-d.kral@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1763400081395 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.015 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [hardware.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 3/7] sim: hardware: initialize default fallback static_service_stats X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Otherwise the already defined HA resources in the service config will not have valid static service stats. This intentionally doesn't set default values for HA resources, which don't have any static service stats set, if the static_service_stats file exists, to prevent test cases relying on fallback values. Currently, test cases do not depend on any automatically generated config files. In the future, creating these files as fallbacks should be moved to the pve-ha-simulator entirely to prevent test cases relying on them anyway. Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral --- src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm index 41d21326..9bc753dd 100644 --- a/src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm +++ b/src/PVE/HA/Sim/Hardware.pm @@ -488,6 +488,10 @@ sub new { if (-f "$testdir/static_service_stats") { copy("$testdir/static_service_stats", "$statusdir/static_service_stats"); + } else { + my $services = $self->read_service_config(); + my $stats = { map { $_ => { maxcpu => 4, maxmem => 4096 } } keys %$services }; + $self->write_static_service_stats($stats); } my $cstatus = $self->read_hardware_status_nolock(); -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel