From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84621FF165 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:53:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0BD78106BA; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:54:26 +0100 (CET) From: Nicolas Frey To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:54:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20251106085423.99138-1-n.frey@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.099 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RDNS_NONE 0.793 Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 1/1] api: apt: add 'all' option to Arch property X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" The `all` architecture is defined for e.g. all proxmox perl packages, so add it to the enum. This would lead to an error in the update view in PDM: [...] failed to parse api response: unknown variant `all` [...] Reported-by: Lukas Wagner Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frey --- PVE/API2/APT.pm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/PVE/API2/APT.pm b/PVE/API2/APT.pm index 1ccbaf97..395ce070 100644 --- a/PVE/API2/APT.pm +++ b/PVE/API2/APT.pm @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ my $apt_package_return_props = { Arch => { type => 'string', description => 'Package Architecture.', - enum => [qw(armhf arm64 amd64 ppc64el risc64 s390x)], + enum => [qw(armhf arm64 amd64 ppc64el risc64 s390x all)], }, Description => { type => 'string', -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel