From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 316C81FF15C for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:03:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E803319527; Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:04:57 +0200 (CEST) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 16:03:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20250808140419.119992-3-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 In-Reply-To: <20250808140419.119992-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20250808140419.119992-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1754661838127 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.026 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/2] d/postinst: lvm config: check that --clear-needs-check-flag is set if there is a thin_check_options override X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Quoting the commit message from [0] verbatim: thin_check v1.0.x reveals data block ref count issue that is not being detected by previous versions, which blocks the pool from activation if there are any leaked blocks. To reduce potential user complaints on inactive pools after upgrading and also maintain backward compatibility between LVM and older thin_check, we decided to adopt the 'auto-repair' functionality in the --clear-needs-check-flag option, rather than passing --auto-repair from lvm.conf. [0]: https://github.com/device-mapper-utils/thin-provisioning-tools/commit/eb28ab94 Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner --- debian/postinst | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/debian/postinst b/debian/postinst index b1761c24..b6e07fd9 100755 --- a/debian/postinst +++ b/debian/postinst @@ -238,6 +238,14 @@ case "$1" in /usr/libexec/proxmox/proxmox-rrd-migration-tool --migrate || \ echo "migration failed, see output above for errors and try to migrate existing data manually by running '/usr/libexec/proxmox/proxmox-rrd-migration-tool --migrate'" fi + + if test -n "$2" && dpkg --compare-versions "$2" 'lt' '9.0.4'; then + if test -e /etc/lvm/lvm.conf && grep "^\s*thin_check_options" /etc/lvm/lvm.conf | grep -qv -- "--clear-needs-check-flag"; then + printf '\nNOTE: Detected override for 'thin_check_options' without '--clear-needs-check-flag' option in /etc/lvm/lvm.conf\n' + printf 'Add the option to the override or thin pools with minor issues might not automatically activate anymore!\n\n' + fi + fi + ;; abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure) -- 2.47.2 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel