From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A2C1FF17C for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 15:47:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 568203ACF6; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 15:49:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Shannon Sterz To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 15:48:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20250806134843.266183-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1754488102674 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.127 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment POISEN_SPAM_PILL 0.1 Meta: its spam POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com, pve8to9.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] 8 to 9: use more robust systemd version parsing regex from pve-container X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" previously some distrubtions could not be parsed here, leading to reports that containers are not compatible with the dropped cgroup support. however, this was due to a over sensitive regex. instead use the more robust version we already use for pve-container [1]. this was reported for an OpenSUSE Slowroll container on the forum: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/169302/ [1]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;f=PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm;h=994189f1#l1285 Signed-off-by: Shannon Sterz --- PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm b/PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm index 994189f13..a7ee842de 100644 --- a/PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm +++ b/PVE/CLI/pve8to9.pm @@ -1282,7 +1282,8 @@ sub check_containers_cgroup_compat { last if defined($libsd); } if ( - defined($libsd) && $libsd =~ /libsystemd-shared-(\d+)(\.\d-\d)?(\.fc\d\d)?\.so/ + defined($libsd) + && $libsd =~ /libsystemd-shared-(\d+)(?:[-.][a-zA-Z0-9]+)*\.so:?$/ ) { return $1; } -- 2.47.2 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel