From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5202D1FF16B for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:43:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2EAD83DF89; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:44:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Heiss To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 15:43:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20250715134403.962663-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 Average reputation (+2) RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH installer] auto: tests: fix up lvm swapsize test after heuristic change X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" The heuristic was changed in the commit mentioned below, the respective test needs adjustment too. Fixes: 08136f8 ("avoid artificial limit and allow using up to half of hdsize as swap") Signed-off-by: Christoph Heiss --- .../parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.json | 2 +- .../parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.toml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/proxmox-auto-installer/tests/resources/parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.json b/proxmox-auto-installer/tests/resources/parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.json index aa4f7fe..e0e59c5 100644 --- a/proxmox-auto-installer/tests/resources/parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.json +++ b/proxmox-auto-installer/tests/resources/parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.json @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ { - "error": "Swap size 4.01 GiB cannot be greater than 4 GiB (hard disk size / 8)" + "error": "Swap size 16.01 GiB cannot be greater than 16 GiB (hard disk size / 2)" } diff --git a/proxmox-auto-installer/tests/resources/parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.toml b/proxmox-auto-installer/tests/resources/parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.toml index ffe16dc..22a7f6b 100644 --- a/proxmox-auto-installer/tests/resources/parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.toml +++ b/proxmox-auto-installer/tests/resources/parse_answer_fail/lvm_swapsize_greater_than_hdsize.toml @@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ source = "from-dhcp" [disk-setup] filesystem = "ext4" -lvm.swapsize = 4.01 +lvm.swapsize = 16.01 lvm.hdsize = 32 disk-list = ["sda"] -- 2.49.0 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel