From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB71E94D7E for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:11:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8BEC51F06E for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:10:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:10:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CFEF3449C6 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:10:45 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:10:44 +0200 Message-Id: <20240411101044.304124-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.057 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager] d/postinst: make deb-systemd-invoke non-fatal X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:11:16 -0000 else this can break an upgrade for unrelated reasons. this also mimics debhelper behaviour more (which we only not use here because of lack of reload support) - restructured the snippet to be more similar with an explicit `if` as well. Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler --- debian/pve-ha-manager.postinst | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/debian/pve-ha-manager.postinst b/debian/pve-ha-manager.postinst index 94ab797..5c8f0cd 100644 --- a/debian/pve-ha-manager.postinst +++ b/debian/pve-ha-manager.postinst @@ -5,11 +5,13 @@ set -e #DEBHELPER# if [ "$1" = "triggered" ]; then - systemctl --quiet is-active pve-ha-lrm.service && - deb-systemd-invoke reload-or-try-restart pve-ha-lrm.service + if systemctl --quiet is-active pve-ha-lrm.service; then + deb-systemd-invoke reload-or-try-restart pve-ha-lrm.service || true + fi - systemctl --quiet is-active pve-ha-crm.service && - deb-systemd-invoke reload-or-try-restart pve-ha-crm.service + if systemctl --quiet is-active pve-ha-crm.service; then + deb-systemd-invoke reload-or-try-restart pve-ha-crm.service || true + fi fi exit 0 -- 2.39.2