From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <c.ebner@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E92BDBBA33 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:17:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF4D010EDD for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:17:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:17:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1E2F342151 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:17:13 +0100 (CET) From: Christian Ebner <c.ebner@proxmox.com> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:16:55 +0100 Message-Id: <20240326091659.63483-1-c.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [nodes.pm, nodeconfig.pm, proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 pve-manager pve-docs 0/4] add optional WoL config options X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 09:17:15 -0000 For certain network setups the default values currently used to send a wake on lan magic packet are not correct, e.g. it will get send via the interface for which the default gateway is configured. This patches add optional configuration options to set a bind interface, over which to send the WoL packet and/or set a broadcast address to use. The functionality was tested by listening on all interfaces of the sending host via `tcpdump -i any udp port 9`, and testing the combinations of `pvenode config set -wakeonlan XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX,bind-interface=<iface-name>` and `pvenode config set -wakeonlan XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX,broadcast-address=<broadcast-address>`. See also the thread in the community forum https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/123459/ pve-manager: Christian Ebner (3): node: config: make wakeonlan a property string fix #5255: node: wol: add optional bind interface fix #5255: node: wol: configurable broadcast address PVE/API2/Nodes.pm | 23 ++++++++++++++++---- PVE/NodeConfig.pm | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) pve-docs: Christian Ebner (1): pvenode/wake-on-lan: mention optional config options pvenode.adoc | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) -- 2.39.2