From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBFE8C1786
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:22:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ACE7F36C08
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:22:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:22:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9A6BF4914A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:22:50 +0100 (CET)
From: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 14:22:38 +0100
Message-Id: <20240116132240.132246-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.053 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 1/3] qm: resource limits: revise section
 cpulimit
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:22:51 -0000

* precise statements
* increase compactness w/o complexity
* improve section-formatting

Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
---
 qm.adoc | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/qm.adoc b/qm.adoc
index c2392f3..268a635 100644
--- a/qm.adoc
+++ b/qm.adoc
@@ -336,31 +336,33 @@ context switches.
 Resource Limits
 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
-In addition to the number of virtual cores, you can configure how much resources
-a VM can get in relation to the host CPU time and also in relation to other
-VMs.
-With the *cpulimit* (``Host CPU Time'') option you can limit how much CPU time
-the whole VM can use on the host. It is a floating point value representing CPU
-time in percent, so `1.0` is equal to `100%`, `2.5` to `250%` and so on. If a
-single process would fully use one single core it would have `100%` CPU Time
-usage. If a VM with four cores utilizes all its cores fully it would
-theoretically use `400%`. In reality the usage may be even a bit higher as QEMU
-can have additional threads for VM peripherals besides the vCPU core ones.
+*cpulimit*
+
+In addition to the number of virtual cores, the total available ``Host CPU
+Time'' for the VM can be set with the *cpulimit* option. It is a floating point
+value representing CPU time in percent, so `1.0` is equal to `100%`, `2.5` to
+`250%` and so on. If a single process would fully use one single core it would
+have `100%` CPU Time usage. If a VM with four cores utilizes all its cores
+fully it would theoretically use `400%`. In reality the usage may be even a bit
+higher as QEMU can have additional threads for VM peripherals besides the vCPU
+core ones.
+
 This setting can be useful if a VM should have multiple vCPUs, as it runs a few
 processes in parallel, but the VM as a whole should not be able to run all
-vCPUs at 100% at the same time. Using a specific example: lets say we have a VM
-which would profit from having 8 vCPUs, but at no time all of those 8 cores
-should run at full load - as this would make the server so overloaded that
-other VMs and CTs would get to less CPU. So, we set the *cpulimit* limit to
-`4.0` (=400%). If all cores do the same heavy work they would all get 50% of a
-real host cores CPU time. But, if only 4 would do work they could still get
-almost 100% of a real core each.
+vCPUs at 100% at the same time.
+
+Using a specific example: lets say we have a VM which would profit from having
+8 vCPUs, but at no time all of those 8 cores should run at full load - as this
+would make the server so overloaded that other VMs and CTs would get too less
+CPU. So, we set the *cpulimit* limit to `4.0` (=400%). If we now fully utilize
+all 8 vCPUs, they will receive maximum 50% CPU time of the physical cores. But
+with only 4 vCPUs fully utilized, they could still get up to 100% CPU time.
 
 NOTE: VMs can, depending on their configuration, use additional threads, such
 as for networking or IO operations but also live migration. Thus a VM can show
 up to use more CPU time than just its virtual CPUs could use. To ensure that a
-VM never uses more CPU time than virtual CPUs assigned set the *cpulimit*
-setting to the same value as the total core count.
+VM never uses more CPU time than vCPUs assigned, set the *cpulimit* to
+the same value as the total core count.
 
 The second CPU resource limiting setting, *cpuunits* (nowadays often called CPU
 shares or CPU weight), controls how much CPU time a VM gets compared to other
-- 
2.39.2