From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F2B4BEDA8
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:07:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E4B9515C44
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:07:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:07:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 35A2D4529B
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:07:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 12:06:55 +0100
Message-Id: <20240102110655.155329-5-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2
In-Reply-To: <20240102110655.155329-1-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
References: <20240102110655.155329-1-p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.039 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
Subject: [pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v7 4/4] tests: check if
include/exclude behavior works correctly
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 11:07:44 -0000
This checks if including and excluding works as expected. That the
filter are added out of order is on purpose since it sould make no
difference.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>
---
tests/sync_jobs.rs | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/sync_jobs.rs
diff --git a/tests/sync_jobs.rs b/tests/sync_jobs.rs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..45b46f14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/sync_jobs.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+use pbs_api_types::{BackupGroup, BackupType, GroupFilter};
+use std::str::FromStr;
+
+#[test]
+fn test_no_filters() {
+ let group_filters = vec![];
+
+ let do_backup = vec![
+ "vm/101", "vm/102", "vm/103", "vm/104", "vm/105", "vm/106", "vm/107", "vm/108", "vm/109",
+ ];
+
+ for id in do_backup {
+ assert!(BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id).apply_filters(&group_filters));
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_include_filters() {
+ let group_filters = vec![GroupFilter::from_str("regex:.*10[2-8]").unwrap()];
+
+ let do_backup = vec![
+ "vm/102", "vm/103", "vm/104", "vm/105", "vm/106", "vm/107", "vm/108",
+ ];
+
+ let dont_backup = vec!["vm/101", "vm/109"];
+
+ for id in do_backup {
+ assert!(BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id).apply_filters(&group_filters));
+ }
+
+ for id in dont_backup {
+ assert!(!BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id).apply_filters(&group_filters));
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_exclude_filters() {
+ let group_filters = vec![
+ GroupFilter::from_str("exclude:regex:.*10[1-3]").unwrap(),
+ GroupFilter::from_str("exclude:regex:.*10[5-7]").unwrap(),
+ ];
+
+ let do_backup = vec!["vm/104", "vm/108", "vm/109"];
+
+ let dont_backup = vec!["vm/101", "vm/102", "vm/103", "vm/105", "vm/106", "vm/107"];
+
+ for id in do_backup {
+ assert!(BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id).apply_filters(&group_filters));
+ }
+ for id in dont_backup {
+ assert!(!BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id).apply_filters(&group_filters));
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_include_and_exclude_filters() {
+ let group_filters = vec![
+ GroupFilter::from_str("exclude:regex:.*10[1-3]").unwrap(),
+ GroupFilter::from_str("regex:.*10[2-8]").unwrap(),
+ GroupFilter::from_str("exclude:regex:.*10[5-7]").unwrap(),
+ ];
+
+ let do_backup = vec!["vm/104", "vm/108"];
+
+ let dont_backup = vec![
+ "vm/101", "vm/102", "vm/103", "vm/105", "vm/106", "vm/107", "vm/109",
+ ];
+
+ for id in do_backup {
+ assert!(BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id).apply_filters(&group_filters));
+ }
+
+ for id in dont_backup {
+ assert!(!BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id).apply_filters(&group_filters));
+ }
+}
--
2.39.2