From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF56C9BADC
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:47:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C08E231FEC
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:46:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F10CE435CC
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:46:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christoph Heiss <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:46:43 +0200
Message-ID: <20231020094651.432513-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [options.rs, setup.rs, runenv.pm, net.pm, utils.rs, ietf.org]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH installer 0/5] use hostname from DHCP lease if
available
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 09:47:30 -0000
DHCP servers can set option 12 ("host-name") for client leases [0],
telling them about their hostname. It's very much non-invasive and falls
back to the default values as done currently.
This came up while talking to Aaron, which he noticed (esp. during
trainings) that this would be a very useful feature too have.
I have tested this with the "host-name" entry set and unset, as well as
any combinations of that with the domain name being set or unset.
[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2132#section-3.14
Christoph Heiss (5):
net: move hostname/fqdn regexes into common code
run env: retrieve and store hostname from DHCP lease if available
proxinstall: use hostname from run env if available
tui: use hostname from run env if available
tui: add some tests for `NetworkInfo` -> `NetworkOptions` conversion
Proxmox/Install/RunEnv.pm | 4 +
Proxmox/Sys/Net.pm | 28 ++++++
proxinstall | 15 +--
proxmox-tui-installer/src/options.rs | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
proxmox-tui-installer/src/setup.rs | 3 +
proxmox-tui-installer/src/utils.rs | 2 +-
6 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.42.0