From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61537833F
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:05:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 439A21AEEC
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:04:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:04:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5713A42507
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:04:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:04:30 +0200
Message-Id: <20230621100433.36525-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.046 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [cloudinit.pm, qemuserver.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES qemu-server/manager] restore PVE 7
default for cloudinit package upgrades
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:05:07 -0000
Commit efa3355d ("fix #3428: cloudinit: add parameter for upgrade on
boot") changed the default, but this is a breaking change. The bug
report was only about making the option configurable.
The commit doesn't give an explicit reason for why, and arguably,
doing the upgrade is not an issue for most users. It also leads to a
different cloud-init instance ID, because of the different setting,
which in turn leads to ssh host key regeneration within the VM.
Dependency bump manager -> qemu-server doesn't hurt to keep things
aligned (at least in one direction).
Thanks to Friedrich for catching the issue!
qemu-server:
Fiona Ebner (2):
schema: cloudinit: document default for ciupgrade
cloudinit: restore previous default for package upgrades
PVE/QemuServer.pm | 3 ++-
PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
manager:
Fiona Ebner (1):
ui: cloudinit: align default value for package upgrades with backend
again
www/manager6/qemu/CloudInit.js | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2