From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8EB39254A
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:49:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D14D619500
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:49:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:49:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 225D045D1C
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:49:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:49:07 +0100
From: Christoph Heiss <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20230321124907.g65asygtn42eotik@maui.proxmox.com>
References: <20230223141805.446192-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com>
<20230223141805.446192-3-c.heiss@proxmox.com>
<145ebd0c-4ea3-7a4b-daad-60a10c1d4fea@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <145ebd0c-4ea3-7a4b-daad-60a10c1d4fea@proxmox.com>
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.068 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 manager 2/3] ui: qga: Add option to turn
off QGA fs-freeze/-thaw on backup
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:49:08 -0000
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 01:31:44PM +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 23/02/2023 um 15:18 schrieb Christoph Heiss:
> > [..]
> > + {
> > + xtype: 'displayfield',
> > + userCls: 'pmx-hint',
> > + value: gettext('Freeze/thaw for guest filesystems disabled. '
> > + + 'This can lead to inconsistent disk backups.'),
>
> gettext need to be in a single line - or fix the "parser" that scans for the
> messages in i18n ;-)
Okay, thanks for the hint! Guess I'll drop the the line wrapping for now.
(But the latter would be nice too as a kind of "future-proofing" I
suppose, I'll probably take a shot at it ..)
>
> > [..]