From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EBD58BEAA
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:09:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 106811800F
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:09:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:09:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4C3B244C61
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:09:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:09:46 +0200
Message-Id: <20221028080946.29238-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v3 qemu] init: daemonize: defuse PID file
resolve error
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:09:51 -0000
When proxmox-file-restore invokes QEMU, the PID file is a (temporary)
file that's already unlinked, so resolving the absolute path here
failed.
It should not be a critical error when the PID file unlink handler
can't be registered, because the path can't be resolved for whatever
reason. If the file is already gone from QEMU's perspective (i.e.
errno is ENOENT), silently ignore the error. Otherwise, print a
warning.
Reported-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Suggested-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
Changes from v2:
* Be quiet when error is ENOENT.
softmmu/vl.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
index 0d233d55f3..f71421f80a 100644
--- a/softmmu/vl.c
+++ b/softmmu/vl.c
@@ -2445,10 +2445,11 @@ static void qemu_maybe_daemonize(const char *pid_file)
pid_file_realpath = g_malloc0(PATH_MAX);
if (!realpath(pid_file, pid_file_realpath)) {
- error_report("cannot resolve PID file path: %s: %s",
- pid_file, strerror(errno));
- unlink(pid_file);
- exit(1);
+ if (errno != ENOENT) {
+ warn_report("not removing PID file on exit: cannot resolve PID "
+ "file path: %s: %s", pid_file, strerror(errno));
+ }
+ return;
}
qemu_unlink_pidfile_notifier = (struct UnlinkPidfileNotifier) {
--
2.30.2