From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56ACA74EC2
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 11:22:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 48DBC22F4
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 11:22:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A0C6222DB
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 11:22:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7E44F42A48
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 11:22:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 11:22:49 +0200
Message-Id: <20220602092251.1393709-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20220602092251.1393709-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20220602092251.1393709-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v2 1/3] network: remove ifup ifdown as it
won't reattach guests
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 09:22:53 -0000
Mentioning 'ifup' and 'ifdown' can lead to users running into situations
where they take down one interface, for example an vmbrX. In this
situation the connection to the guests will be lost and not
reestablished automatically if the interface is brought up again with
'ifup'. The better way to apply network changes is to run 'ifreload -a'.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
---
pve-network.adoc | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pve-network.adoc b/pve-network.adoc
index c5e9a17..a33b90c 100644
--- a/pve-network.adoc
+++ b/pve-network.adoc
@@ -12,9 +12,6 @@ complete format description. All {pve} tools try hard to keep direct
user modifications, but using the GUI is still preferable, because it
protects you from errors.
-Once the network is configured, you can use the Debian traditional tools `ifup`
-and `ifdown` commands to bring interfaces up and down.
-
Apply Network Changes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
2.30.2