From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA6972371
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:54:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7E2CCA975
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:54:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id E1C35A96B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:54:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B151B42A45
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 12:54:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 12:54:25 +0200
Message-Id: <20220523105425.3025242-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.006 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] rbd: get_rbd_dev_path: return /dev/rbd
 path only if cluster matches
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 10:54:27 -0000

The changes in cfe46e2d4a97a83f1bbe6ad656e6416399309ba2 git not catch
all situations.
In the case of a guest having 2 disk images with the same name on a pool
with the same name but in two different ceph clusters we still had
issues when starting it. The first disk got mapped as expected. The
second disk did not get mapped because we returned the old $path to
"/dev/rbd/<pool>/<image>" because it already existed from the first
disk.

In the case that only the "old" /dev/rbd path exists and we do not have
the /dev/rbd-pve/<cluster>/... path available, we now check if the
cluster fsid used by that rbd device matches the one we expect. If it
does, then we are in the situation that the image has been mapped before
the new rbd-pve udev rule was introduced. If it does not, then we have
the situation of an ambiguous mapping in /dev/rbd and return the
$pve_path.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
---
 PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm b/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
index 3511914..eeeaf3f 100644
--- a/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
+++ b/PVE/Storage/RBDPlugin.pm
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ package PVE::Storage::RBDPlugin;
 use strict;
 use warnings;
 
+use Cwd qw(abs_path);
 use IO::File;
 use JSON;
 use Net::IP;
@@ -13,7 +14,7 @@ use PVE::JSONSchema qw(get_standard_option);
 use PVE::ProcFSTools;
 use PVE::RADOS;
 use PVE::Storage::Plugin;
-use PVE::Tools qw(run_command trim);
+use PVE::Tools qw(run_command trim file_read_firstline);
 
 use base qw(PVE::Storage::Plugin);
 
@@ -66,7 +67,13 @@ my sub get_rbd_dev_path {
     my $pve_path = "/dev/rbd-pve/${cluster_id}/${rbd_path}";
     my $path = "/dev/rbd/${rbd_path}";
 
-    return $path if !-e $pve_path && -e $path; # mapped before rbd-pve udev rule existed
+    if (!-e $pve_path && -e $path) {
+	# possibly mapped before rbd-pve rule existed
+	my $real_dev = abs_path($path);
+	my ($rbd_id) = ($real_dev =~ m|/dev/rbd([0-9]+)$|);
+	my $dev_cluster_id = file_read_firstline("/sys/devices/rbd/${rbd_id}/cluster_fsid");
+	return $path if $cluster_id eq $dev_cluster_id;
+    }
     return $pve_path;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2