From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F394BBF5E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  2 May 2022 14:36:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E3038275C6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  2 May 2022 14:36:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 104D8275BC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  2 May 2022 14:36:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DC2B4429D5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  2 May 2022 14:36:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon,  2 May 2022 14:36:24 +0200
Message-Id: <20220502123624.2449469-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20220502080928.886800-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
References: <20220502080928.886800-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.002 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v2 follow up 2/4] api: ceph pools: add
 type to returned properties
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2022 12:36:57 -0000

The osd dump already contains the pool type in numerical format.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
---
thanks to @Dominik we found a better place where the numerical pool
types are defined.

 PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm b/PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm
index efdee360..70427277 100644
--- a/PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm
+++ b/PVE/API2/Ceph/Pools.pm
@@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
 		    type => 'integer',
 		    title => 'Size',
 		},
+		type => {
+		    type => 'string',
+		    title => 'Type',
+		    enum => ['replicated', 'erasure', 'unknown'],
+		},
 		min_size => {
 		    type => 'integer',
 		    title => 'Min Size',
@@ -185,6 +190,17 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
 		$d->{bytes_used} = $s->{bytes_used};
 		$d->{percent_used} = $s->{percent_used};
 	    }
+
+	    # Cephs numerical pool types are barely documented. Found the following in the Ceph
+	    # codebase: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/ff144995a849407c258bcb763daa3e03cfce5059/src/osd/osd_types.h#L1221-L1233
+	    if ($e->{type} == 1) {
+		$d->{type} = 'replicated';
+	    } elsif ($e->{type} == 3) {
+		$d->{type} = 'erasure';
+	    } else {
+		# we should never get here, but better be safe
+		$d->{type} = 'unknown';
+	    }
 	    push @$data, $d;
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2