From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6EF767A5
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:33:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 965032AF38
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:33:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1BBC22AF09
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:33:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BC524468E2
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:33:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 11:33:43 +0200
Message-Id: <20211019093353.2451987-3-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20211019093353.2451987-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20211019093353.2451987-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.291 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 01/11] api: ceph-mds: get mds state when
 multple ceph filesystems exist
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 09:33:56 -0000

by iterating over all of them and saving the name to the active ones
this fixes the issue that an mds that is assigned to not the first
fs in the list gets wrongly shown as offline

Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
 PVE/Ceph/Services.pm | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/PVE/Ceph/Services.pm b/PVE/Ceph/Services.pm
index 0f557360..362e479b 100644
--- a/PVE/Ceph/Services.pm
+++ b/PVE/Ceph/Services.pm
@@ -179,13 +179,14 @@ sub get_cluster_mds_state {
     }
 
     my $add_state = sub {
-	my ($mds) = @_;
+	my ($mds, $fsname) = @_;
 
 	my $state = {};
 	$state->{addr} = $mds->{addr};
 	$state->{rank} = $mds->{rank};
 	$state->{standby_replay} = $mds->{standby_replay} ? 1 : 0;
 	$state->{state} = $mds->{state};
+	$state->{fs_name} = $fsname;
 
 	$mds_state->{$mds->{name}} = $state;
     };
@@ -198,13 +199,14 @@ sub get_cluster_mds_state {
 	$add_state->($mds);
     }
 
-    my $fs_info = $fsmap->{filesystems}->[0];
-    my $active_mds = $fs_info->{mdsmap}->{info};
+    for my $fs_info (@{$fsmap->{filesystems}}) {
+	my $active_mds = $fs_info->{mdsmap}->{info};
 
-    # normally there's only one active MDS, but we can have multiple active for
-    # different ranks (e.g., different cephs path hierarchy). So just add all.
-    foreach my $mds (values %$active_mds) {
-	$add_state->($mds);
+	# normally there's only one active MDS, but we can have multiple active for
+	# different ranks (e.g., different cephs path hierarchy). So just add all.
+	foreach my $mds (values %$active_mds) {
+	    $add_state->($mds, $fs_info->{mdsmap}->{fs_name});
+	}
     }
 
     return $mds_state;
-- 
2.30.2