From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gregor@aeppelbroe.de> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A6B970BFB for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:08:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 076012047E for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:07:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.ud08.udmedia.de (ud08.udmedia.de [194.117.254.48]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 975B020474 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:07:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=aeppelbroe.de; h=from :in-reply-to:references:list-id:to:subject:message-id:date :content-type:mime-version; s=k1; bh=C2611w4OBmxehqRZMm9IdOiA2/J 8mifIRWRD61ld6tI=; b=fVrWkAzLvQbsT61kiilObD5kSDNGM8XQBJnH/QGIQq6 6viwg4mXPSmmSyQo1Nxv1tMM2oHJOgb1EZRFmdjQMrPYbe5pFoguLJ8YsZiY5dbs FR/W99J/D19o/mntksqwnqxkwOjjz6d08gVhfTP+oKf4NFPOUBQz5hfm+y1GZ1N0 = Received: (qmail 3253768 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2021 15:07:25 +0200 Received: by mail.ud08.udmedia.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 30 Sep 2021 15:07:25 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: ud08?166p2@wWvLIDbNbdpf3hNG Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baikonur.fritz.box (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB60D27862 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:07:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at baikonur.orbit.local Received: from baikonur.fritz.box ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baikonur.fritz.box [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9eGfzR_nq3d for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from baikonur (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by baikonur.fritz.box (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3316ED27860 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:07:25 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: EGroupware API 17.1.007 From: Gregor Burck <gregor@aeppelbroe.de> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: EGroupware-Mail In-Reply-To: <20210917112921.EGroupware.VUEdiWgpWw30Fp0tioEjJWr@heim.aeppelbroe.de> References: <20210917112921.EGroupware.VUEdiWgpWw30Fp0tioEjJWr@heim.aeppelbroe.de> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> Message-ID: <20210930150725.EGroupware.6J5OaeEYpIws136ZihOWnZX@heim.aeppelbroe.de> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:07:25 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.128 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_INVALID 0.1 DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid FORGED_SPF_HELO 1 - KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [aeppelbroe.de] Subject: Re: [PVE-User] proxmox-restore - performance issues X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 13:08:03 -0000 Hi, I made some other test with the same machine but an other proccessor. I use an Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2643 v3 @ 3.40GHz, wich has a higher frequency. The restore rate for an single job dind't change. Any idea what it could be? Bye Gregor