From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082596D6F1
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:40:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8EC8ADD25
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:40:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B9158DCAB
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:40:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5DF1E44B22
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:40:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:39:45 +0200
Message-Id: <20210928114001.164081-6-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20210928114001.164081-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210928114001.164081-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.312 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [diskmanage.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 05/10] diskmanage: don't set usage for
unused partitions
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:40:50 -0000
The disk type is already 'partition' so there's no additional
information here. And it would need to serve as a code-word for
unused partitions. The cleaner approach is to not set the usage.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
Was not a smart decision back then...If this is considered a breaking
change for the disk list API call, I'll go for a different approach of
course, but AFAICS it would be one of:
1. Keep usage 'partition', but also return the unused partitions when
'include-partitions=1,type=unused', and have disk_is_used not complain
about usage 'partition'.
2. Add a new type filter/extend it so it can handle multiple types,
i.e. type=unused,partition.
3. Request all disks in the frontend and filter there.
PVE/Diskmanage.pm | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/PVE/Diskmanage.pm b/PVE/Diskmanage.pm
index 5614e40..7aad707 100644
--- a/PVE/Diskmanage.pm
+++ b/PVE/Diskmanage.pm
@@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ sub get_disks {
# for devices, this check is done explicitly later
return 'Device Mapper' if !dir_is_empty("$sysdir/holders");
- return 'partition';
+ return; # unused partition
};
my $collect_ceph_info = sub {
@@ -716,7 +716,6 @@ sub get_disks {
my $used = $determine_usage->($devpath, $sysdir, 0);
if (!$include_partitions) {
foreach my $part (sort keys %{$partitions}) {
- next if $partitions->{$part}->{used} eq 'partition';
$used //= $partitions->{$part}->{used};
}
} else {
--
2.30.2