From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1898B6D788
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:40:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 38A3CDEFA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id A9582DCC6
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7DED541815
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:39:57 +0200
Message-Id: <20210928114001.164081-18-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20210928114001.164081-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210928114001.164081-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.308 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [osd.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [RFC manager 5/9] partially fix #2285: api: ceph:
 create osd: allow using partitions
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:40:50 -0000

Note that this does not only allow partitions to be used, but for DB
and WAL disks, one more type of disk, that wasn't allowed before.
Namely, GPT-partitioned disks with any partitions detected as used.
The reason is get_disks' behavior:
  * Without $include_partitions=1, the disk will have the same usage
    as it's first used partition, and thus wasn't allowed. (Except in
    the case that usage was LVM, where the check was bypassed, but
    luckily OSD creation just failed later because no Ceph volume
    group would be detected).
  * With $include_partitions=1, the disk will have usage 'partitions'
    and thus be allowed.

Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---

RFC, because of the weird situation with the DB/WAL disks...

Dependency bump for pve-storage is needed to actually make it work,
because previously it wasn't supported to pass along partitions as
elements of the first argument.

 PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm b/PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm
index 028b37d0..c511f315 100644
--- a/PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm
+++ b/PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
 
 	# test disk requirements early
 	my $devlist = [ map { $_->{name} } values %$devs ];
-	my $disklist = PVE::Diskmanage::get_disks($devlist, 1);
+	my $disklist = PVE::Diskmanage::get_disks($devlist, 1, 1);
 	$test_disk_requirements->($disklist);
 
 	# get necessary ceph infos
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
 
 	    PVE::Diskmanage::locked_disk_action(sub {
 		# update disklist and re-test requirements
-		$disklist = PVE::Diskmanage::get_disks($devlist, 1);
+		$disklist = PVE::Diskmanage::get_disks($devlist, 1, 1);
 		$test_disk_requirements->($disklist);
 
 		my $dev_class = $param->{'crush-device-class'};
-- 
2.30.2