From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D35DD69F39 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:26:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AF68C2EE26 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:26:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 0C17D2EE65 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:25:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D227742C40 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:25:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:25:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20210729122554.148980-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.463 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES proxmox-apt/pve-rs] better detection of standard repositories X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:26:30 -0000 by also requiring the suite to match. Let the caller pass along the current suite instead of auto-detecting, and have the backend only handle static stuff (avoids the need for Result<>). Also refactor check_suites in a similar fashion, so it's more uniform and so that get_current_release_codename only needs to be called once, by the library user. The pve-rs patch #1 is required after proxmox-apt patch #1 is applied. The pve-rs patch #2 is required after proxmox-apt patches #3 and #5 are applied. I'll send the corresponding patches for pmg-rs and proxmox-backup separately. proxmox-apt: Fabian Ebner (5): standard repos: add suite parameter for stricter detection repo: make suite_variant helper more general check repos: have caller specify the current suite repo: remove has_suite_variant helper add type DebianCodename src/repositories/file.rs | 84 ++++++++++++++------------- src/repositories/mod.rs | 31 +++++----- src/repositories/release.rs | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- src/repositories/repository.rs | 33 ++++------- tests/repositories.rs | 27 ++++++--- 5 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-) pve-rs: Fabian Ebner (2): apt: repos: adapt to back-end changes apt: repos: adapt to further back-end changes src/apt/repositories.rs | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2