From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8527736FB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 Jul 2021 15:48:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 91E5722F06
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 Jul 2021 15:47:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2405122EFC
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 Jul 2021 15:47:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E62C740E51
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue,  6 Jul 2021 15:47:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue,  6 Jul 2021 15:47:29 +0200
Message-Id: <20210706134729.84973-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.566 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [storage.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] extract backup config: less precise
 matching for broken pipe detection
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 13:48:03 -0000

Extracting the config for zstd compressed vma files was broken:
    Failed to extract config from VMA archive: zstd: error 70 : Write
    error : cannot write decoded block : Broken pipe (500)
since the error message changed and wouldn't match anymore.

Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---

Hotfix for now, isn't there a better way to properly handle this?

 PVE/Storage.pm | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/PVE/Storage.pm b/PVE/Storage.pm
index b8e6311..c04b5a2 100755
--- a/PVE/Storage.pm
+++ b/PVE/Storage.pm
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ sub extract_vzdump_config_vma {
 	my $errstring;
 	my $err = sub {
 	    my $output = shift;
-	    if ($output =~ m/lzop: Broken pipe: <stdout>/ || $output =~ m/gzip: stdout: Broken pipe/ || $output =~ m/zstd: error 70 : Write error : Broken pipe/) {
+	    if ($output =~ m/lzop: Broken pipe: <stdout>/ || $output =~ m/gzip: stdout: Broken pipe/ || $output =~ m/zstd: error 70 : Write error.*Broken pipe/) {
 		$broken_pipe = 1;
 	    } elsif (!defined ($errstring) && $output !~ m/^\s*$/) {
 		$errstring = "Failed to extract config from VMA archive: $output\n";
-- 
2.30.2