From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0155571752
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:29:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E0C6BB537
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:28:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 69E4DB528
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:28:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B2381444A8;
 Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:23:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:23:17 +0200
From: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
To: Mark Schouten <mark@tuxis.nl>
Cc: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20210629102317.0a29b58f@rosa.proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <0d129a03-9a70-e123-5e5a-e7862ef303ac@tuxis.nl>
References: <5377d815-bde4-9ca8-8584-ff63a6eb27ba@proxmox.com>
 <0d129a03-9a70-e123-5e5a-e7862ef303ac@tuxis.nl>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.581 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Proxmox VE 7.0 (beta) released!
X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, 
 <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 08:29:12 -0000

Hi,

On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:05:44 +0200
Mark Schouten <mark@tuxis.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Op 24-06-2021 om 15:16 schreef Martin Maurer:
> > We are pleased to announce the first beta release of Proxmox Virtual 
> > Environment 7.0! The 7.x family is based on the great Debian 11 
> > "Bullseye" and comes with a 5.11 kernel, QEMU 6.0, LXC 4.0, OpenZFS 2.0.4.  
> 
> I just upgraded a node in our demo cluster and all seemed fine. Except 
> for non-working cluster network. I was unable to ping the node through 
> the cluster interface, pvecm saw no other nodes and ceph was broken.
Thanks for the report - could you provide some details on the upgraded
node? Mostly which NICs are used - but also the complete hardware -setup

(If you prefer you can send me a pvereport to my e-mail)

> 
> However, if I ran tcpdump, ping started working, but not the rest.
quite odd - last time I ran into something like this was with an OpenBSD
router, where the promisc flag did not get passed down to the physical
port of a bridge)

the output of `ip -details a` and `ip -details l` might provide some
insight

> 
> Interesting situation, which I 'fixed' by disabling vlan-aware-bridge 
> for that interface. After the reboot, everything works (AFAICS).
Thanks for sharing the mitigation (sadly this won't work for everybody)

> 
> If Proxmox wants to debug this, feel free to reach out to me, I can 
> grant you access to this node so you can check it out.
> 

Kind Regards,
stoiko