From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99C697451E
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:56:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 066951C487
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:55:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 5D46C1C328
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:55:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3884542977
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:55:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:55:34 +0200
Message-Id: <20210621135534.14807-22-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
In-Reply-To: <20210621135534.14807-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20210621135534.14807-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.806 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 8/8] ui: window/Migrate: allow mapped
devices
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:56:37 -0000
if the migration is an offline migration and when the mapping on
the target node exists, otherwise not
this does not change the behaviour for 'raw' devices in the config
those can still be forced to be migrated, like before
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
www/manager6/window/Migrate.js | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/www/manager6/window/Migrate.js b/www/manager6/window/Migrate.js
index 5122e25f..c1fadfea 100644
--- a/www/manager6/window/Migrate.js
+++ b/www/manager6/window/Migrate.js
@@ -219,14 +219,26 @@ Ext.define('PVE.window.Migrate', {
let target = me.lookup('pveNodeSelector').value;
if (target.length && !migrateStats.allowed_nodes.includes(target)) {
let disallowed = migrateStats.not_allowed_nodes[target];
- let missingStorages = disallowed.unavailable_storages.join(', ');
+ if (disallowed.unavailable_storages !== undefined) {
+ let missingStorages = disallowed.unavailable_storages.join(', ');
- migration.possible = false;
- migration.preconditions.push({
- text: 'Storage (' + missingStorages + ') not available on selected target. ' +
- 'Start VM to use live storage migration or select other target node',
- severity: 'error',
- });
+ migration.possible = false;
+ migration.preconditions.push({
+ text: 'Storage (' + missingStorages + ') not available on selected target. ' +
+ 'Start VM to use live storage migration or select other target node',
+ severity: 'error',
+ });
+ }
+
+ if (disallowed.unavailable_resources !== undefined) {
+ let missingResources = disallowed.unavailable_resources.join(', ');
+
+ migration.possible = false;
+ migration.preconditions.push({
+ text: 'Mapped Resources (' + missingResources + ') not available on selected target. ',
+ severity: 'error',
+ });
+ }
}
}
@@ -249,6 +261,17 @@ Ext.define('PVE.window.Migrate', {
}
}
+ if (migrateStats.mapped_resources && migrateStats.mapped_resources.length) {
+ if (vm.get('running')) {
+ migration.possible = false;
+ migration.preconditions.push({
+ text: Ext.String.format('Can\'t migrate running VM with mapped resources: {0}',
+ migrateStats.mapped_resources.join(', ')),
+ severity: 'error',
+ });
+ }
+ }
+
if (migrateStats.local_disks.length) {
migrateStats.local_disks.forEach(function(disk) {
if (disk.cdrom && disk.cdrom === 1) {
--
2.20.1