From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29128722F0
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:27:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 26A362D81A
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:27:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B32182D80E
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:27:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8E00E4402F
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:27:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:27:26 +0200
Message-Id: <20210615112729.1099797-4-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20210615112729.1099797-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20210615112729.1099797-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.828 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [control.in]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH kernel 3/6] d/control: provide linux-libc-dev
with version
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:27:45 -0000
needed for it to be a proper replacement for linux-libc-dev when
resolving dependencies, such as for liburing-dev
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
---
debian/control.in | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/control.in b/debian/control.in
index a9c8dd8..6cdc9df 100644
--- a/debian/control.in
+++ b/debian/control.in
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ Package: pve-kernel-libc-dev
Section: devel
Priority: optional
Architecture: any
-Provides: linux-libc-dev,
+Provides: linux-libc-dev (=${binary:Version}),
Conflicts: linux-libc-dev,
Replaces: linux-libc-dev,
Depends: ${misc:Depends}
--
2.30.2