From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA5872F93
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 21BF5155FD
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 7B067155F4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 34E414668A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 26 May 2021 16:52:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 16:51:59 +0200
Message-Id: <20210526145159.13175-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.007 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH firewall] set sysctls on every apply
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 14:52:24 -0000

setting the sysctls needed on every run should not be too costly
(the original implementation used a `system` invocation, which was
far more expensive), and reduce the chances for side-effects.

Signed-off-by: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
---
tested quickly on a test-installation of mine

 src/PVE/Firewall.pm | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/PVE/Firewall.pm b/src/PVE/Firewall.pm
index 50be187..fc5c077 100644
--- a/src/PVE/Firewall.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/Firewall.pm
@@ -1818,11 +1818,9 @@ sub rules_audit_permissions {
 }
 
 # core functions
-my $bridge_firewall_enabled = 0;
 
 sub enable_bridge_firewall {
 
-    return if $bridge_firewall_enabled; # only once
 
     PVE::ProcFSTools::write_proc_entry("/proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables", "1");
     PVE::ProcFSTools::write_proc_entry("/proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-ip6tables", "1");
@@ -1830,7 +1828,6 @@ sub enable_bridge_firewall {
     # make sure syncookies are enabled (which is default on newer 3.X kernels anyways)
     PVE::ProcFSTools::write_proc_entry("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_syncookies", "1");
 
-    $bridge_firewall_enabled = 1;
 }
 
 sub iptables_restore_cmdlist {
-- 
2.20.1