From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924F5696CA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:26:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8ABA126975
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:26:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 82FA126953
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:26:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4894B458EB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:26:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:26:49 +0100
Message-Id: <20210311102650.6730-5-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
In-Reply-To: <20210311102650.6730-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20210311102650.6730-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.002 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 container 4/5] config: parse: also allow
 empty values
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 10:26:55 -0000

because they are valid for '-list' formats and it makes the behavior match with
what we do for VM configs. The new pattern is the same that is used for VM
configs. Because it is a non-greedy pattern, trailing whitespaces will not be
included in the value anymore. This /should/ cause no problems and the '\s*$'
at the end suggests that that is how it was intended in the first place.

Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---

No changes from v1.

 src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
index 5d223b2..de7e924 100644
--- a/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/LXC/Config.pm
@@ -933,7 +933,7 @@ sub parse_pct_config {
 	    } else {
 		warn "vm $vmid - property 'delete' is only allowed in [pve:pending]\n";
 	    }
-	} elsif ($line =~ m/^([a-z][a-z_]*\d*):\s*(\S.*)\s*$/) {
+	} elsif ($line =~ m/^([a-z][a-z_]*\d*):\s*(.+?)\s*$/) {
 	    my $key = $1;
 	    my $value = $2;
 	    eval { $value = PVE::LXC::Config->check_type($key, $value); };
-- 
2.20.1