From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412D16513B
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:08:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2E37122EA7
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:08:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[212.186.127.180])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1CF9D22E9C
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:08:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D443145F2D
for <pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:08:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:08:04 +0100
Message-Id: <20201102120804.11635-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.419 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
medium trust
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pbs-devel] [RFC PATCH] fix #3039: use the same ID regex for info
and api
X-BeenThere: pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox Backup Server development discussion
<pbs-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pbs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel>,
<mailto:pbs-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:08:36 -0000
in the api we use PROXMOX_SAFE_ID_REGEX for backup ids, but here
(where we use it to list them) we use a local regex
since the first is a superset of the one used here, simply extend
the local one
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
i mean we *could* refactor that regex to a place where we could
use it from both places (tools? proxmox crate?), but is it worth it for
the 3 character changes?
src/backup/backup_info.rs | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/backup/backup_info.rs b/src/backup/backup_info.rs
index 3ace44dc..c5d245e9 100644
--- a/src/backup/backup_info.rs
+++ b/src/backup/backup_info.rs
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use lazy_static::lazy_static;
use super::manifest::MANIFEST_BLOB_NAME;
-macro_rules! BACKUP_ID_RE { () => (r"[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9_-]+") }
+macro_rules! BACKUP_ID_RE { () => (r"[A-Za-z0-9_][A-Za-z0-9._\-]*") }
macro_rules! BACKUP_TYPE_RE { () => (r"(?:host|vm|ct)") }
macro_rules! BACKUP_TIME_RE { () => (r"[0-9]{4}-[0-9]{2}-[0-9]{2}T[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}Z") }
--
2.20.1