From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 559E162E50
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:07:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4799516B6E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:07:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id CBC0716B66
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:07:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8DE5145426
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:07:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:07:08 +0200
Message-Id: <20200918140708.31197-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 docs] zfs: fix typos
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:07:10 -0000

Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
---

v1 -> v2: found another one...

 local-zfs.adoc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/local-zfs.adoc b/local-zfs.adoc
index 58629d7..89ab8bd 100644
--- a/local-zfs.adoc
+++ b/local-zfs.adoc
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ Using `ashift=9` when creating the pool can lead to bad
 performance, depending on the disks underneath, and cannot be changed later on.
 
 Mirror vdevs (RAID1, RAID10) have favorable behavior for VM workloads. Use
-them, unless your environmanet has specific needs and charactersitics where
+them, unless your environment has specific needs and characteristics where
 RAIDZ performance characteristics are acceptable.
 
 
-- 
2.20.1