From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB0FD5BD53
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:05:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E01C12FEDD
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:05:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[212.186.127.180])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1B0572FED1
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:05:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DAF294231E
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:05:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:05:02 +0200
Message-Id: <20200708100502.1729552-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.100 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
medium trust
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [proxmox.com, storage.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] archive_info: relax custom name handling
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 10:05:38 -0000
we already differentiate between standard and non-standard names anyway
and don't detect and return the VMID in the latter case anyway. drop it
from the RE as well to allow names like 'vzdump-qemu-template.vma.lzo'
without the need for a fake VMID.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
---
we previously handled those names just fine, and this is affecting
existing usecases:
https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/2020-July/171802.html
PVE/Storage.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/PVE/Storage.pm b/PVE/Storage.pm
index ffa1484..edf9a2e 100755
--- a/PVE/Storage.pm
+++ b/PVE/Storage.pm
@@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ sub archive_info {
my $info;
my $volid = basename($archive);
- if ($volid =~ /^(vzdump-(lxc|openvz|qemu)-\d+-.+\.(tgz$|tar|vma)(?:\.(${\PVE::Storage::Plugin::COMPRESSOR_RE}))?)$/) {
+ if ($volid =~ /^(vzdump-(lxc|openvz|qemu)-.+\.(tgz$|tar|vma)(?:\.(${\PVE::Storage::Plugin::COMPRESSOR_RE}))?)$/) {
my $filename = "$1"; # untaint
my ($type, $format, $comp) = ($2, $3, $4);
my $format_re = defined($comp) ? "$format.$comp" : "$format";
--
2.20.1