From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F0439170E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  2 Feb 2023 11:23:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5652BA82C
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  2 Feb 2023 11:22:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  2 Feb 2023 11:22:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 04B9D43B74
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu,  2 Feb 2023 11:22:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <201a05ba-2cf0-ce6c-6947-a10088e3e9a2@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 11:22:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:110.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/110.0
Content-Language: en-GB, de-AT
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20230201154917.1632212-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
 <20230201154917.1632212-3-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230201154917.1632212-3-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.005 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A            -0.09 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/3] ui: Utils: refactor refreshing
 the the resource store/tree
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 10:23:01 -0000

Am 01/02/2023 um 16:49 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
> we'll need it elsewhere too, and it was rather hidden in the
> updateTagSettings call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  www/manager6/Utils.js         | 3 +++
>  www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/www/manager6/Utils.js b/www/manager6/Utils.js
> index fcc668c3a..ee9e4bd5d 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/Utils.js
> +++ b/www/manager6/Utils.js
> @@ -1871,6 +1871,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.Utils', {
>  
>  		PVE.Utils.updateTagList(PVE.UIOptions['allowed-tags']);
>  		PVE.Utils.updateTagSettings(PVE.UIOptions?.['tag-style']);
> +		PVE.Utils.fireUIUpdate();
>  	    },
>  	});
>      },
> @@ -1920,7 +1921,9 @@ Ext.define('PVE.Utils', {
>  	}
>  
>  	Ext.ComponentQuery.query('pveResourceTree')[0].setUserCls(`proxmox-tags-${shape}`);
> +    },
>  
> +    fireUIUpdate: function() {

naming is off for this as it uses the action desired (but that's not future proof)
instead of using the actual event being fired, e.g., do s/fireUIUpdate/fireUIConfigChange/

btw, utils _really_ is a convoluted mess that needs some basic cleanup rather sooner
than later...

>  	if (!PVE.data.ResourceStore.isLoading() && PVE.data.ResourceStore.isLoaded()) {
>  	    PVE.data.ResourceStore.fireEvent('load');
>  	}
> diff --git a/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js b/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js
> index 9c803beef..2e4f76263 100644
> --- a/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js
> +++ b/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js
> @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.dc.OptionView', {
>  
>  	    PVE.UIOptions['tag-style'] = store.getById('tag-style')?.data?.value;
>  	    PVE.Utils.updateTagSettings(PVE.UIOptions['tag-style']);
> +	    PVE.Utils.fireUIUpdate();
>  	});
>  
>  	me.on('activate', me.rstore.startUpdate);