From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C27299BF4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 May 2023 13:26:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 073549F1D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 May 2023 13:26:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed,  3 May 2023 13:26:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A305046F49;
 Wed,  3 May 2023 13:26:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1ed81c96-4228-adea-c3ec-e82a29a9e59e@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 13:26:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Markus Frank <m.frank@proxmox.com>
References: <20230425102136.85334-1-m.frank@proxmox.com>
 <20230425102136.85334-4-m.frank@proxmox.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Cc: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230425102136.85334-4-m.frank@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.135 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL          0.1 Meta: its spam
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1        0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3        0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v4 3/6] added Config for Shared
 Filesystem Directories
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 11:26:48 -0000

just a short comment since this series overlaps a bit with my
cluster resource mapping series (i plan on sending a v4 soon).

i'd prefer to have the configuration endpoints for mapping bundled in a subdirectory
so instead of /nodes/<node>/dirs/ i'd put it in /nodes/<node>/mapping/dirs/
(or /nodes/<node>/map/dirs )

@thomas, @fabian, any other input on that?