From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE45F1FF16B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:58:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 453F013AB3; Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:59:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1e677c07-929c-466c-bf7d-4cf5adfd0997@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:59:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Wolfgang Bumiller References: <20250729111557.136012-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com> <20250729111557.136012-7-w.bumiller@proxmox.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Fiona Ebner In-Reply-To: <20250729111557.136012-7-w.bumiller@proxmox.com> X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1753797553001 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.026 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [common.pm] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 06/26] common: use v5.36 X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Am 29.07.25 um 1:16 PM schrieb Wolfgang Bumiller: > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller > --- > src/PVE/Storage/Common.pm | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/Common.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/Common.pm > index 746a262..222dc76 100644 > --- a/src/PVE/Storage/Common.pm > +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/Common.pm > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > package PVE::Storage::Common; > > -use strict; > -use warnings; > +use v5.36; > > use PVE::JSONSchema; > use PVE::Syscall; Do you need a specific feature from v5.36? Would be great to have some context. And should we go for v5.40, since that's what we have in Trixie? Or are there any reservations about specific language changes? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel