From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B61DD73452
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:44:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 982D91853F
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:44:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id BD23F18526
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:44:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8D24E45AA9
 for <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:44:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1c3b90d3-e6c3-accb-97fe-5e0603579c5f@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:44:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/88.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Victor Hooi <victorhooi@yahoo.com>,
 PVE development discussion <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>
References: <CAMnnoUL0iRSk_24b9jeTqFmEvJi+P6e+WzQv8ZwdKu6oMXXVgw.ref@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMnnoUL0iRSk_24b9jeTqFmEvJi+P6e+WzQv8ZwdKu6oMXXVgw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMnnoUL0iRSk_24b9jeTqFmEvJi+P6e+WzQv8ZwdKu6oMXXVgw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.041 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 KAM_SHORT               0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [ceph.io]
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] Ceph Pacific testing?
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 10:44:56 -0000

Hi,

On 14.04.21 22:05, Victor Hooi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Ceph Pacific was recently announced:
> 
> https://ceph.io/releases/v16-2-0-pacific-released/
> 
> Do you know if anybody has started testing this for Proxmox yet?
> 
> Or are there alpha/beta packages we could run in a test lab?

FYI: We plan to build and release this for upcoming PVE 7.0 this year, based on
Debian bullseye.

cheers,
Thomas