From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B30376D0C for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 19:53:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 89FE0ADED for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 19:52:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 25EF4ADE0 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 19:52:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E5D7C46271 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Sat, 24 Apr 2021 19:52:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1bd19317-7994-caf0-ed1c-43c45f5fb5ba@proxmox.com> Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 19:52:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:89.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/89.0 Content-Language: en-US To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>, Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com> References: <20210129075440.31248-1-d.whyte@proxmox.com> <20210129075440.31248-2-d.whyte@proxmox.com> From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <20210129075440.31248-2-d.whyte@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.007 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 pve-docs] resource-pools: add section in docs X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 17:53:01 -0000 On 29.01.21 08:54, Dylan Whyte wrote: > Adds a second-level heading for resource pools and adds creation of pool > to example. > > Signed-off-by: Dylan Whyte <d.whyte@proxmox.com> > --- > v1->v2: no change > > .../screenshot/gui-datacenter-pool-window.png | Bin 0 -> 8591 bytes > pveum.adoc | 40 ++++++++++++------ > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 images/screenshot/gui-datacenter-pool-window.png > > applied, thanks! FYI: I adapted the CLI command examples to use the sub-command groups in a followup.