From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78D46040B
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:40:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D57721B99D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:40:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D69E71B98E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:40:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A5E9645DB9
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:40:31 +0200 (CEST)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
References: <20200928083631.30407-1-m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
 <20200928083631.30407-2-m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <1b520b95-1bfe-6232-0ccf-20f415b9e721@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:40:31 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:82.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/82.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200928083631.30407-2-m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.131 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [qemuserver.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH v2 qemu-server 2/2] fix clone_disk
 failing for nonexistent cloudinit disk
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:40:32 -0000

On 28.09.20 10:36, Mira Limbeck wrote:
> After migration or a rollback the cloudinit disk might not be allocated, so
> volume_size_info() fails. As we override the value anyway for cloudinit
> and efi disks simply move the volume_size_info() call into the 'else'
> branch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mira Limbeck <m.limbeck@proxmox.com>
> ---
> v2: changed subject
> 
>  PVE/QemuServer.pm | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
>

applied, thanks!